成唯識論述記 3.397

3.397

述曰：此敘彼計，下破之云，此應非遍行，住此境無故。彼名大地法，亦遍行義故。若相微隱，由何知有？《瑜伽》第三謂心迴轉，然約顯相處說，非為盡理，不同彼執，得為盡理。《集論》初說於所緣境持心令住，故論敘言：

The Commentary states: This recounts their doctrine; below it will refute it by saying that it should not be an omnipresent factor (sarvatraga), because it would be absent when abiding on this object. For them it is called a mahābhūmika dharma, which also has the meaning of being omnipresent. If its aspect is subtle and hidden, how is it known to exist? The third chapter of the Yogācārabhūmi refers to the turning of the mind, but this is spoken from the perspective of manifest aspects, not as an exhaustive principle; it is not like their attachment, which takes it as an exhaustive principle. The beginning of the Abhidharmasamuccaya says that it holds the mind and causes it to abide on the focal object; hence the treatise recounts: