成唯識論述記 3.412

3.412

述曰：今應問彼，如何說受能領俱觸？受定不緣俱生觸，故不可說緣而受名領觸，緣相應法如前已破，又違汝宗。若觸前受後，後受領前觸，既不緣前觸，如何名為領？或應觸、受一念不俱。

The Commentary states: Now one should ask them: How can sensation be said to be able to experience co-arising contact? Sensation definitely does not cognize co-arising contact; hence it cannot be said that by cognizing it sensation is called 'experiencing contact'. That it cognizes concomitant dharmas has already been refuted above, and it also contradicts your own school's tenets. If contact were prior and sensation posterior, such that posterior sensation experienced prior contact, since it does not cognize prior contact, how could it be called 'experiencing'? Or else, contact and sensation would not be simultaneous in a single thought-moment.