成唯識論述記 3.425

3.425

述曰：若言自緣，名領自性，違汝自執，不自證故。彼計心等不能自緣，故說自緣，便違自失。故次第九彼復救曰：言自領者，非謂自緣，不拾受自相，名自性受故。故次第十論主復非。

The Commentary states: If you say that self-cognition is called 'experiencing intrinsic nature', this contradicts your own tenets, because there is no self-verification (svasaṃvedana). Their school holds that mind and so forth cannot cognize themselves; therefore, saying that it cognizes itself directly commits an error against their own tenets. Thus, ninth, they rescue [their position] again, saying: Calling it 'self-experiencing' does not mean self-cognition; because it does not abandon the self-characteristic of sensation, it is called 'sensation of intrinsic nature'. Therefore, tenth, the author of the treatise rejects it again.