成唯識論述記 3.437

3.437

述曰：此中安立，取像異名，謂此是青，非非青等，作此分齊而取共相名為安立。由取此像便起名言此是青等，性類眾多故名種種。諸論說名為其想者，從因而說；說想為名，從果而說，如世人言汝想是何，名是何等？此業但是意俱之想，餘識俱想，不起名故。設疎起名亦無失者，第八識想如何起名？由此故知此業不遍。

The Commentary states: Here, 'establishing' is an alternative term for taking an image: that is, [determining that] 'this is green, not non-green,' etc., making such delimitations and taking the universal characteristic is called establishing. Because of taking this image, one then gives rise to conventional designations like 'this is green,' etc.; since the types of natures are numerous, they are called 'various'. When various treatises call conventional designations 'perception', they speak from the cause; when they call perception 'conventional designation', they speak from the effect—just as worldly people say, 'What is your thought (saṃjñā)? What is the name (nāma)?' This activity applies only to perception concomitant with the mental consciousness (manovijñāna); perception concomitant with the other consciousnesses does not give rise to names. Even if it is said that it gives rise to names indirectly without fault, how could perception in the eighth consciousness give rise to names? From this, one knows that this activity is not omnipresent.