成唯識論述記 3.484

3.484

述曰：異熟必非通善、染故，十一、六、二十亦定不相應。等者，等取餘善等法，即不定四既通三性亦在其中。然有難曰：善、染非異熟，可說不相應。不定中無記，何非此識並？為答此問，故次說云。

The Commentary states: Maturation definitely cannot be common to the wholesome or defiled; thus the eleven, the six, and the twenty are definitely not associated either. "And so forth" includes the remaining wholesome and other dharmas, meaning that the four indeterminates, since they are common to the three natures, are also included among them. However, there is an objection: "Wholesome and defiled factors are not maturations, so they may be said not to be associated; why should the indeterminate factors among the indeterminates not co-occur with this consciousness?" To answer this question, it next states: