成唯識論述記 3.720

3.720

述曰：此師意說無現執藏，《瑜伽》說此即名為捨，以阿賴耶是藏義故。此亦說彼名阿羅漢，三義具故，如前應知。問：若現不執，即名為捨，七地以前亦有不執，入無漏心等，應皆名捨。答：此不然，非竟畢故。畢竟不行，方名為捨故。問：若爾，二乘金剛心，應名捨此識。答：實亦應名捨，以時促故，彼《瑜伽》等略而不論，亦不違理。初師名捨斷種名捨，此第二說若斷、若伏畢竟不行，說之為捨，故七地前不得捨名。

The Commentary states: This master's meaning is that active grasping as a storehouse is absent; the Yogācārabhūmi says that this is named abandonment, because ālaya has the meaning of "storehouse." This text also says that they are named arhats, because they possess all three meanings, as should be understood from before. Question: If not grasping actively is immediately named abandonment, then prior to the seventh stage there is also non-grasping when entering uncontaminated minds and so forth; should all these be named abandonment? Answer: This is not so, because it is not ultimate. Only when they definitively do not occur is it named abandonment. Question: If so, practitioners with training of the two vehicles in the vajropamasamādhi should be said to abandon this consciousness. Answer: In reality they should indeed be called abandoning, but because the duration is brief, the Yogācārabhūmi and so forth omit it and do not discuss it; this also does not conflict with reason. For the first master, "abandonment" means abandonment by severing seeds; in this second explanation, whether severed or suppressed, if they definitively do not occur, it is spoken of as abandonment; therefore, before the seventh stage one cannot obtain the designation of abandonment.