成唯識論述記 4.323

4.323

述曰：次第二設許趣生攝一切有漏，即善等皆是。生無色界起無漏心，應非趣生，即是便違正理。有二乘聖者非趣生攝故，即《攝論》第三云：生非想處起無所有處無漏心時，即應二趣皆應滅離等。但有設許一切有漏是趣生難，皆以前難應尋彼會。此通諸部，義准前釋。

The Commentary states: Next is the second [refutation]: supposing one concedes that the destinies and realms comprehend all tainted [phenomena], then wholesome [minds] and the like are all included. [However,] when one is born in the formless realm and gives rise to an untainted mind, one would not belong to any destiny or realm, which then contradicts correct reasoning. This is because noble persons of the two vehicles would not be subsumed under any destiny or realm; thus Mahāyānasaṃgraha, fascicle 3, states: when one is born in the stage of neither-conceptualization-nor-non-conceptualization and gives rise to an untainted mind of the stage of nothingness, then two destinies would both be eliminated, and so forth. All objections conceding that all tainted phenomena constitute the destinies and realms should be resolved by consulting the previous objections. This applies broadly to the various schools, and its meaning conforms to the earlier explanations.