成唯識論述記 4.526

4.526

述曰：若有阿賴耶，是真異熟故一切時有。汝無本識於此位中異熟識斷，異熟斷已，離託餘生無重生故，即《攝論》同。量云：出滅定已應是重生；許真異熟識斷已重生故；如餘重生身。又異熟心，斷已應不續；異熟攝故；如異熟色。六識異熟雖斷可生，自許說彼非真異熟。雖是他許真異熟法，然非此宗共所許故，無不定過。

The Commentary states: If the ālayavijñāna exists, it is the true vipāka and therefore exists at all times. You lack the fundamental consciousness, so in this state the vipāka consciousness is interrupted; once the vipāka is interrupted, apart from taking another birth there is no rebirth, which is identical to the Mahāyānasaṃgraha. The inference is: After emerging from the attainment of cessation, it should be a rebirth; because you accept that the true vipāka consciousness is reborn after being interrupted; like another body that is reborn. Furthermore, the vipāka mind, having been interrupted, should not continue; because it is subsumed under vipāka; like vipāka form. Although the vipāka of the six consciousnesses may arise after being interrupted, we ourselves maintain that they are not the true vipāka. Although they are accepted by the other as true vipāka dharmas, they are not mutually accepted by this school, so there is no fault of inconclusiveness (anaikāntika).