成唯識論述記 4.53

4.53

述曰：此廣別解。於中有二：初、總說也；下、自料簡。身中無漏種，名順還滅法。言還、滅者，五十一解：還即道諦，滅即滅諦。即種順現行，道能證滅也。或與現行道為依持，令證得涅槃。前順於後，體順於用，還順於滅，准前應釋。此解順下第一，但說證得師解，即出世淨若無此識皆不得成。或攝世間淨，遠證涅槃故。或但涅槃是識執持，亦是依執。雖言執持無漏法種，而意證涅槃但取涅槃，是所依執故。《攝論》第四三性中言：依他起性為遍計所執依，亦圓成實之所依也，涅槃是所求果故此偏說。順下第二但取涅槃解，第三雙取，執持無漏種，及涅槃依故。釋頌中言「涅槃證得」，為取證得？為取涅槃？

[The Commentary states:] This is the detailed distinct analysis. Within this there are two parts: first, a general explanation; below, the definitive analysis itself. The untainted seeds within the body are called the factors conforming to cessation. As for the words "return and cessation," the fifty-first [fascicle of the Yogācārabhūmi] explains: return is the truth of the path, and cessation is the truth of cessation. That is, the seeds conform to the active manifestation, and the path can realize cessation. Alternatively, it serves as the support for the active path, causing one to attain nirvāṇa. The prior conforms to the latter, substance conforms to function, and return conforms to cessation, which should be explained in accordance with the preceding. This explanation accords with the first master below who says only "attainment," meaning that without this consciousness, supramundane purification cannot be established at all. Or it subsumes worldly purification, as it distantly realizes nirvāṇa. Or it is solely nirvāṇa that is upheld by consciousness, which is also an upholding by way of support. Although it speaks of upholding seeds of untainted factors, the intention is realizing nirvāṇa, and taking only nirvāṇa, it is that which is upheld by way of support. In chapter four of the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, under the three natures, it says: the other-dependent nature is the support for the imagined nature, and also the support for the consummate nature; nirvāṇa is the fruit sought, hence it is singled out here. This accords with the second interpretation below which takes only nirvāṇa, while the third takes both, upholding untainted seeds and being the support for nirvāṇa. Explaining the words "attainment of nirvāṇa" in the verse: does it take attainment, or does it take nirvāṇa?