成唯識論述記 4.533

4.533

述曰：第三難。色不離識如第一卷，持種受熏如第二、三卷，破色不離識意說何等？此位有色明有本識，非本識無而許有色。本識可受熏，而非色持種。既雙破二宗，下俱結正義。

The Commentary states: The third objection. That form is not separate from consciousness is as explained in fascicle one; holding seeds and receiving perfuming is as explained in fascicles two and three. What is the meaning of refuting that form is separate from consciousness? That form exists in this state shows that the fundamental consciousness exists; it is not that form is admitted to exist while the fundamental consciousness is absent. The fundamental consciousness can receive perfuming, whereas form cannot hold seeds. Having refuted both schools, below it concludes together with the correct doctrine.