成唯識論述記 4.556

4.556

述曰：既有心所法，何名滅受想？經部救言：言有心所非謂受想，有餘思等故。又難：何故唯受、想滅，思等不滅？

The Commentary states: Since caitasika dharmas exist, why is it called the cessation of vedanā and saṃjñā? The Sautrāntika rescues [its position] by saying: Stating that caitasikas exist does not mean vedanā and saṃjñā exist, because other [dharmas] such as cetanā exist. Again [the opponent] objects: Why is it that only vedanā and saṃjñā cease, while cetanā and the rest do not cease?