Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

成唯識論述記 4.576

成唯識論述記 4.576

Language
Classical Chinese

4.576

述曰:如尋、伺故比量所諍,許如思等大地法故。根本經部說有三法遍行,大乘、薩婆多各說有二:謂即受、想,故別立蘊,作用強故。彼說三大地故,今言思等,等取何法?謂有二計:一、唯計有三法,如前觸即三合,無別體故;二、計有四法,即觸數故。下言三和成觸即是前計,三和生觸即第二計。計別有體,故今言等意攝二家。又設有餘非別有法,此論別體。若依分位,於思之上亦名為定等理亦無違,一念之思所望別故。然未見文,准《俱舍》云:謂通三性、有尋伺等三地名為大地,即更有餘法。今量云:受、想定是遍行;許是大地法故;如思等法。

The Commentary states: Being like vitarka and vicāra, this is disputed by inference, because they are admitted to be mahābhūmika-dharmas like cetanā and the rest. The fundamental Sautrāntika states that there are three omnipresent dharmas; the Mahāyāna and the Sarvāstivāda each state that there are two—namely vedanā and saṃjñā—and therefore establish them as separate skandhas because their functions are strong. Because they state three mahābhūmikas, when it now says "cetanā and the rest", what dharmas are included by "and the rest"? There are two assertions: first, it posits only three dharmas, where, as stated before, contact is simply the conjunction of the three, having no distinct substantial entity; second, it posits four dharmas, namely the caitasika of contact. Below, when it states that the harmony of the three constitutes contact, that is the first assertion; that the harmony of the three generates contact is the second assertion, positing a distinct substantial entity. Therefore, saying "and the rest" now is intended to encompass both schools. Furthermore, even if there were other dharmas, they are not separate substantial entities; this refers to distinct entities. If based on states, [dharmas] upon cetanā are also designated as samādhi and so on, which logically presents no contradiction either, because a single moment of cetanā has different aspects. However, I have not seen the text. In accordance with the Abhidharmakośa, it says: what pervades the three natures and the three grounds of having vitarka and vicāra, etc., are called mahābhūmikas, which means there are still other dharmas. Now the formal argument states: Vedanā and saṃjñā are definitely omnipresent; because they are admitted to be mahābhūmika-dharmas; like dharmas such as cetanā.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (1)