成唯識論述記 4.602

4.602

述曰：此位受、想亦應許有；許有思等故；如所餘位。此難則以有思理齊，如餘位說受、想有故。與前少別，許有受、想亦復何辜？

The Commentary states: In this state, vedanā and saṃjñā should also be admitted to exist; because cetanā and the rest are admitted to exist; like all other states. This objection is based on the equal principle of having cetanā: just as in other states, vedanā and saṃjñā are said to exist. It differs slightly from the previous [objection]. What harm is there in admitting that vedanā and saṃjñā exist?