成唯識論述記 4.606

4.606

述曰：於中有二：初破有令無難；後縱有別生徵。初中有五問答：初問中文長此諍大地非信、貪等，以彼無時心尚有故。量云：滅定之位，無第六心；以無大地心所法故；如悶絕等位。彼若救言：此受等如信等；信等雖無仍有心故；如起染時。即復難言：

The Commentary states: Herein there are two parts: first, refuting [their claim of] existence by showing that it leads to non-existence; later, granting its existence to raise a different interrogation. In the first there are five questions and answers. In the first question, the text is lengthy. This disputes the mahābhūmikas, not śraddhā, rāga, and so forth, because when those are absent, citta still exists. The formal argument states: In the state of the absorption of cessation, the sixth citta does not exist; because it is devoid of mahābhūmika-caitasika dharmas; like the state of swoon, etc. If they rescue by saying: these vedanā and the rest are like śraddhā and the rest; although śraddhā and the rest are absent, there is still citta; like when defilement arises. Then [the author] objects again: