成唯識論述記 4.622

4.622

述曰：自下第二經部之中有二師救：一、無別觸，即三和是觸故；二、別有觸數，三和外別有故。即今經部猶有二師，彼皆餘時三和有力，無別觸故能成於觸，有別觸故能生於觸。以有或成、或生觸故，能俱起受等，此是定前心等俱也。由此定前厭患心所，所既被厭，故在定位三事無能，隨彼二說不成生觸。既爾此位亦無受等，不可以餘不被厭位而例此中。

The Commentary states: Next, in the second section, there are two masters within the Sautrāntika who offer defenses: first, that there is no separate contact, as the coming together of the three is itself contact; second, that there is a separate mental factor of contact, existing distinctly outside the coming together of the three. Even today the Sautrāntika has these two masters. In both of their views, at other times the coming together of the three has efficacy: because there is no separate contact, it can constitute contact; or because there is a separate contact, it can generate contact. Because of constituting or generating contact, feeling and so forth can arise simultaneously; this occurs together with the mind and so forth prior to the attainment. Because one felt revulsion toward the mental factors prior to this attainment, and these factors have been reviled, the three things lack efficacy in the state of the attainment; according to either of the two theories, contact is neither constituted nor generated. Since that is so, in this state there are also no feeling and so forth; one cannot use other states that are not reviled to draw a parallel to this [attainment].