成唯識論述記 4.629

4.629

述曰：自下第五論主難云：既爾此定，心亦應滅；與前所厭受等俱故；如厭心所。隨彼計難：非謂共許，此他比量。若伏救云：如厭貪等染心所滅而心不滅，寧厭受等心所滅，故心亦遣滅？論主若言：厭貪等時心亦已隨滅，後時別有心生者，此亦應然，厭時之心隨受、想滅，後時別有無所心生。

The Commentary states: Next, in the fifth section, the author of the treatise objects: Since that is so, in this attainment, mind should also cease, because it occurred together with the feeling and so on that were reviled before, just like the reviled mental factors. This objection follows his own assertion; it is not what is mutually accepted, but a syllogism [ad hominem] for the opponent. If he covertly defends: "Just as when one feels revulsion toward greed and so forth, the defiled mental factors cease but mind does not cease, why should mind also be eliminated and ceased because of revulsion toward the mental factors of feeling and so on?" If the author of the treatise says: When feeling revulsion toward greed and so on, mind has also ceased alongside them, and at a later time a different mind arises; here it should also be like this: the mind at the time of revulsion ceases along with feeling and conception, and at a later time a different mind lacking mental factors arises.