成唯識論述記 4.674

4.674

述曰：彼論釋言：非過去煩惱生今煩惱等，經部師計去、來無故。此論依彼正破經部，此中文意兼破薩婆多，彼以去、來有故，界地往還無失。今言非實，如前類破無染心後煩惱不生，彼言我宗有得得者。今破彼言：亦非實有，同去、來故；前已破故；類下淨章中，得等非實故。又言持種，略得不言，正破經部故。設彼救云：界地往還諸煩惱等後時無因生。

The Commentary states: That treatise explains: it is not that past afflictions produce present afflictions, etc., because the Sautrāntika masters posit that past and future are non-existent. This treatise relies on that to directly refute the Sautrāntikas. The meaning of this text also incidentally refutes the Sarvāstivādins: because they hold that past and future exist, transitioning between realms and stages would be faultless [for them]. Now, stating that they are 'not substantial' analogously refutes [them as before]: regarding afflictions not arising after an undefiled mind, they say, 'Our school posits prāpti (possession).' Now we refute them, saying: [prāpti] is also not substantially existent, being the same as the past and future; because it was already refuted earlier; and by analogy with the section on purity below, prāpti and so forth are not substantial. Furthermore, in speaking of 'holding seeds,' prāpti was omitted and not mentioned because it directly refutes the Sautrāntikas. Suppose they rescue their position by saying: the various afflictions upon transitioning between realms and stages arise without a cause at a later time.