成唯識論述記 4.694

4.694

述曰：此則如文。後不成者，《攝論》云：又取緣有亦不得成為難。兩家熏緣、感果，難之返覆准上應知。又非但後取緣於有，次第相望皆可得爾，果中相緣故。次別破淨，於中有二：第一總顯淨法；後別破之。

The Commentary states: This is just as the text says. Regarding 'the subsequent are not established,' the Mahāyānasaṃgraha says: 'Furthermore, grasping conditioning existence also cannot be established,' as an objection. The back-and-forth objections regarding the two schools' perfuming as conditioning and inducing fruits should be understood by analogy with the above. Furthermore, it is not only that the subsequent grasping conditions existence; viewed sequentially in relation to each other, all are like this, because among fruits they mutually condition one another. Next is the separate refutation of purity, in which there are two parts: first, generally revealing pure dharmas; second, refuting them individually.