成唯識論述記 4.723

4.723

述曰：此則雙破。非經部師許有去、來，故不得言惑在過去，惑在未來。薩婆多言：我宗不立識能持種，實有去、來及與得等故有斷果。又命根、同分設持惑種無此過失，今言去來得等非實有故，如上已破。經部師言，餘皆有失，我今復言惑種在於色等之中，難言：

The Commentary states: This then refutes both. The Sautrāntika master does not admit the existence of past and future; therefore they cannot say that the defilements exist in the past or that the defilements exist in the future. The Sarvāstivādin says: 'Our school does not posit that consciousness can sustain seeds; because past and future as well as possession and the like are substantially existent, there is the fruition of abandonment. Furthermore, even if the life-faculty (jīvitendriya) or generic similarity (nikāya-sabhāgatā) sustained the seeds of defilement, there would be no such flaw.' Now it is stated that 'because past, future, possession, and the like are not substantially existent,' they have already been refuted as above. The Sautrāntika master says: 'All other [positions] have flaws; I now say again that the seeds of defilement exist within form (rūpa) and the like.' To challenge this, it is said: