成唯識論述記 4.780

4.780

述曰：此言可解，即總結簡。今言「唯心心所具三所依，名有所依，非所餘法」者，諸色等法唯有因緣，無餘二依。今假設如小乘無心定，是等無間緣果，有等無間依，及因緣依，無俱有增上緣依義，不具三故不名有所依。此前汎出三種所依通心心所，然其道理既未明顯，更須廣示第二廣諍，三依不同即為三段。

The Commentary states: These words can be easily understood; this is a summarizing exclusion. Now, saying 'only citta and caitasikas possess the three bases and are called possessing bases, and not other dharmas': dharmas such as matter (rūpa) have only the causal condition and lack the other two bases. Now hypothesize that, like the mindless samādhi (acittaka-samāpatti) in the Hīnayāna, it is the fruit of the equal-and-immediate condition, possessing the equal-and-immediate basis and the basis as causal condition, yet it lacks the meaning of the simultaneous basis as predominant condition; because it does not possess all three, it is not called 'possessing bases'. Previously, the three kinds of bases were broadly set forth as common to citta and caitasikas; however, since their principle has not yet been clarified, it must be shown more extensively. The second part, extensively debating the differences among the three bases, constitutes three sections.