成唯識論述記 4.930

4.930

述曰：量斥前師。若第八識不遍依諸根，而能執受者，六識應然，並非遍依故。全分不依，能執受者，第六應然，亦全不依五色根故。量云：汝異熟識非能執受；不遍依止有色根故；如前六識。以無過量令非執受故，或前六識亦能執受有色根身；以性是識不遍依止有色根故；如汝所許第八識性。若但第六為量；因云：無有少分依色根故；如汝許第八。此為大失，故依色根。

[The Commentary states:] Refuting the previous master with syllogisms: If the eighth consciousness does not pervasively rely on all faculties and yet were able to appropriate them, the six consciousnesses should be the same, since neither pervasively relies on them. If it does not rely on them at all and yet were able to appropriate them, the sixth consciousness should be the same, since it also does not rely on the five physical sense-faculties at all. The syllogism is: Your ripening consciousness cannot appropriate; because it does not pervasively rely on the physical sense-faculties; like the preceding six consciousnesses. Since it is a flawless syllogism, it forces it to not appropriate. Or: The preceding six consciousnesses could also appropriate the physical sense-organs and body; because by nature they are consciousnesses that do not pervasively rely on physical sense-faculties; like your accepted nature of the eighth consciousness. If one formulates the syllogism using only the sixth, the reason would be: because it does not even slightly rely on physical sense-faculties; like your accepted eighth. This is a great flaw; therefore it relies on the physical sense-faculties.