成唯識論述記 5.130

5.130

述曰：此顯不緣相分——色等及彼種子——，以於三界中一類緣故，不緣彼境，若緣彼境者，即我所執有時無故。若緣彼種者，無能緣用，非殊勝法不可計我故。又應我所有時斷故，唯緣識體及彼心所。以何為證？

[The Commentary states:] This shows that it does not take the nimittabhāga—matter and the like, as well as its seeds—as cognitive object, because throughout the three realms it grasps uniformly, and does not take that objective sphere as cognitive object. If it took that objective sphere as cognitive object, then grasping at what belongs to a self (ātmīyagrāha) would sometimes be absent. If it took those seeds as cognitive object, they lack the function of taking cognitive objects, and not being superior dharmas, they cannot be grasped as a self. Moreover, what belongs to a self would sometimes be interrupted. Therefore, it only takes the substance of consciousness and its caitasikas as cognitive objects. What is the proof?