成唯識論述記 5.134

5.134

述曰：以理屬教令義明了，即一念心有二行解，若緣我時，即帶我所行相轉故。問：若緣體為我，心所為所，何故論言但緣彼識，不言緣所？為答此問：

[The Commentary states:] By connecting reason to scripture to clarify the meaning, a single moment of citta has two modes of understanding: when taking self as cognitive object, it operates bearing the ākāra of what belongs to a self. Question: If taking the substance is self and taking caitasikas is what belongs to a self, why does the treatise only say that it takes that consciousness as cognitive object, and not say that it takes caitasikas as cognitive object? To answer this question: