成唯識論述記 5.229

5.229

述曰：此中三見俱分別起，唯見所斷，《瑜伽》五十八、《對法》等皆作是說。此俱煩惱唯是俱生，修道所斷，故不相應。何以知者？如下引文，金剛喻定方能斷故。《對法》第四云：任運起者，修道斷故。

The Commentary states: Here, these three views are all arisen through conceptual discrimination (vikalpita) and are abandoned solely by vision (darśanaheya); Yogācāra[bhūmi], fascicle 58, the Abhidharma[samuccaya], and so on all state this. The afflictions concomitant with this [seventh consciousness] are solely innate (sahaja) and abandoned by the path of cultivation; therefore, they are not associated [with those three]. How is this known? As cited below, only the adamantine-like concentration (vajropama-samādhi) can abandon them. Fascicle 4 of the Abhidharma[samuccaya] states: Those that arise spontaneously are abandoned by the path of cultivation.