成唯識論述記 5.299

5.299

述曰：解十遍文。二十二者，邪欲、勝解明攝在中，亦簡不定。隨，簡根本，解通麁細，簡忿等十。二性，簡別無慚、無愧，通後二義言遍。說十，非所餘法。二十二等，雖簡他法，非所遍義，故論三文亦無違理。

The Commentary states: Explaining the text on the ten as omnipresent. As for the twenty-two, wrong desire and resolve are clearly subsumed within them, and this also excludes the indeterminates. 'Secondary' excludes the fundamental; 'understanding pervading coarse and subtle' excludes the ten such as anger. 'The two natures' excludes non-shame and non-conscience; pervading the latter two meanings is why they are called 'omnipresent.' It speaks of ten, not the remaining dharmas. Although the twenty-two and so forth exclude other dharmas, they are not the meaning of omnipresence; therefore the three texts of the treatises do not contradict logic either.