成唯識論述記 5.315

5.315

述曰：此例與上第一師同。若遠例於上，第八識同故不別說，根本四惑如前共說。然忘念一縱是癡分，以其行相，與別境中念分無別故，不說有。不正知設惠分，亦是癡分。散亂別體者，與定、惠行相別，恐謂亦俱，故今別說。又以不正知行相增強，既許有惠，恐亦許有，故為簡之。忘念、邪欲、邪解，由前理故，亦非遍數。別境少分，故此不說。

The Commentary states: This analogy is the same as that of the first master above. If drawn as a distant analogy with the above, it is the same as the eighth consciousness and so is not separately explained; the four fundamental afflictions are shared as explained before. However, even if forgetfulness is a part of delusion, because its ākāra does not differ from the part of mindfulness among the particular objects, it is not stated to exist. Even if incorrect knowing is a part of wisdom, it is also a part of delusion. Distraction having a distinct substance differs in ākāra from concentration and wisdom; fearing one might think it also associates, it is now separately stated. Furthermore, because the ākāra of incorrect knowing is strong, since wisdom is accepted to exist, fearing one might also accept that it exists, it is excluded. Forgetfulness, wrong desire, and wrong resolve, by the aforementioned reasoning, are also not omnipresent factors. Being small parts of the particular objects, they are therefore not stated here.