成唯識論述記 5.361

5.361

述曰：「餘論不說此二遍」者，由此二體雖遍染心，若緣非愛事，情則不欲此事，疑於理時不印於理。於此二境，欲及勝解相非麁故，體細是有，相非顯著。「不說」者，約麁顯，論體實是有，顯此二時即無欲、解，不說為遍。此據有體，所以言遍。

The Commentary states: 'That other treatises do not state that these two are universal' means: although the real entities of these two pervade defiled minds, when one takes an unpleasant matter as an object, one's disposition does not desire this matter; and when one doubts the principle, one does not ascertain the principle. Toward these two objects, the marks of desire and resolve are not coarse; their subtle entity exists, but their mark is not conspicuous. 'Not mentioned' is said with reference to what is coarse and manifest; in terms of real entity they actually exist, but when these two [unpleasant matter and doubted principle] are manifested, desire and resolve are [seemingly] absent, so they are not said to be universal. This [assertion of universality] is based on their having real entities, which is why they are called universal.