成唯識論述記 5.424

5.424

述曰：此第二解。此識俱惑，隨生處是何地即此地攝。此第七意，為自俱時四惑所繫，名彼所繫，識是所繫，煩惱能繫也。何名所生？為第八識所生之地煩惱繫縛，名彼所繫。又解此文三釋：一云，謂生欲界，乃至應知亦爾以來；此中意說，若生欲界之現行末那，其相應心所隨彼心王即欲界繫，繫是屬義，如臣屬王。任運恒緣，乃至名彼所繫以來；此中意說，以能緣心屬彼所緣之地所繫，相從名繫，如牛屬捨。任運恒緣至非他地故以來，釋能緣心屬所緣義，下方正解，先顯所由，後解屬故。或為彼地，乃至名彼所繫以來；此中意說，心王屬彼，隨第八識所生之地煩惱所繫，以王屬臣屬相應縛。雖有此義前解為勝。

The Commentary states: This is the second explanation. The defilements associated with this consciousness are subsumed under whichever bhūmi is the place of birth. This seventh manas is bound by the four defilements that are simultaneous with itself, so it is called bound to that [bhūmi]; the consciousness is what is bound, and the defilements are what bind. What is meant by "place of birth"? Being bound by the defilements of the bhūmi in which the eighth consciousness is born, it is called bound to that [bhūmi]. Again, this passage is explained in three ways: First: from "That is to say, when born in the desire realm" down to "should be known to be likewise"; what this means is that if it is the manifest manas born in the desire realm, its associated mental factors, following that cittarāja, are bound to the desire realm; "bound" means subordinate, just as ministers are subordinate to a king. From "Spontaneously and constantly grasping" down to "it is called bound to that [bhūmi]"; what this means is that the consciousness that grasps is bound to the bhūmi of its intentional object, called bound by conformity, just as an ox belongs to a house. From "Spontaneously and constantly grasping" to "not of another bhūmi" explains the meaning of the consciousness that grasps belonging to the intentional object; below is the correct explanation, first showing the reason and then explaining the belonging. From "Or, being bound by that bhūmi's" down to "it is called bound to that [bhūmi]"; what this means is that the cittarāja belongs to that, bound by the defilements of the bhūmi in which the eighth consciousness is born, taking the king as belonging to the ministers in the sense of association bondage. Although this meaning exists, the former explanation is superior.