成唯識論述記 5.451

5.451

述曰：若斷種子畢竟斷者，即迂會無學，名不退菩薩。何故不說，同第八識初師捨義為問。然上所明因位之中，二乘有學、頓悟菩薩、廻心有學菩薩，同類故不別簡。定性之中三乘無學，並已明訖，唯有廻心無學與菩薩不同，應次別說為同何例。此一切時與彼未廻心者等故，此雖是菩薩，仍名阿羅漢，以應義等，即攝彼在畢竟斷位阿羅漢中，故不別說；如前第八識中，第一師解。以上文義諸家共同，更無異說，文勢總故。

The Commentary states: If those who sever seeds are those who sever them definitively, then those who detour to the non-learner state are called non-retrogressing bodhisattvas. Why are they not stated? This question is asked just as with the meaning of abandonment according to the first master in the eighth consciousness. However, in the causal stage clarified above, learners of the two vehicles, suddenly awakening bodhisattvas, and learners among bodhisattvas who turned their minds belong to the same category, so they are not separately differentiated. Among the fixed nature, non-learners of the three vehicles have all already been clarified; only non-learners who turned their minds are different from bodhisattvas, and should next be stated separately as to which precedent they conform to. Since this is at all times equal to those who have not yet turned their minds, although this is a bodhisattva, they are still named an arhat, because their corresponding meaning is equal; that is, they are subsumed under the arhat in the stage of definitive severance, and therefore not separately stated, just as explained by the first master under the eighth consciousness above. The meaning of the text above is common to all masters, with no divergent theories, because the flow of the text is general.