成唯識論述記 5.460

5.460

述曰：護法等釋，三位無染義，非體亦無。六十三云：問：若彼末那於一切時思量而轉，如世尊說，出世末那云何建立？准此《大論》及此處文，稱經說有，准下證有此識。即是《解脫經》、六十三中有二解：一、名假不如義，即出世末那實不思量故；二、遠離顛倒思量，能正思量，故通於淨。此違教，次違理。

The Commentary states: Dharmapāla and others explain that the three states lack the defiled characteristic, not that they lack its substance as well. Fascicle sixty-three states: Question: If that manas operates through cogitation at all times, as the World-Honoured One said, how is the supramundane manas established? In accordance with this text of the Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra and this passage, it matches the statement that sūtras declare it exists, and in accordance with below, it proves the existence of this consciousness. That is, in the Vimokṣa-sūtra and fascicle sixty-three there are two explanations: first, the name is nominal and does not correspond to the actual meaning, which means the supramundane manas does not truly cogitate [self]; second, it is far removed from inverted cogitation and can correctly cogitate, and hence it extends to purity. This contradicts scriptural teaching, and next it contradicts reasoning.