成唯識論述記 5.535

5.535

述曰：三緣不攝，皆此緣攝；三無記不攝，皆此無記攝。何者非異熟生耶？餘三雖亦從異熟生。然有別名，此不在彼別名中故，是總名攝。然即別名，非餘三故；如《佛地》第七，及此論下二障中敘。然此第二雖是總束，上為三位解第十門訖，自下第二大段，引教及理，證有此識。

The Commentary states: What is not subsumed under the [other] three conditions is entirely subsumed under this condition; what is not subsumed under the [other] three indeterminate [natures] is entirely subsumed under this indeterminate [nature]. Which is not born of maturation? Although the remaining three are also born of maturation, they nevertheless have specific names; because this is not among those specific names, it is subsumed under the general designation. Yet it is precisely a specific name and not the remaining three, as explained in the seventh [fascicle] of the Buddhabhūmi[-sūtra-śāstra] and below in this treatise under the two obstacles. However, although this second [section] is a general summary, the explanation of the tenth topic for the three stages above is now complete; below begins the second major section, which cites scriptural authority and reasoning to prove the existence of this consciousness.