成唯識論述記 5.563

5.563

述曰：此第七識六證頌云：「不共六二緣，意名二定別，無想許有染，有情我不成。」自下第二，正辨難中有六義證，此初證中文有其二：初引經證；後理徵釋。如《緣起經》有四無明：一、現；二、種；三、相應；四、不相應。或有為二：共、不共等。此中難不共者，謂此微細常行，行相難知，覆無我理，蔽無漏智，名覆蔽真實。真實有二：一、無我理；二、無漏見。義有二義：一謂境義，見分境故；二謂義理，真如即理故。然不共無明，大小乘經皆共依信。此上經文，若無此識彼應非有。是論師說，何名不共？

The Commentary states: The verse outlining the six proofs for this seventh consciousness says: "Unshared, six, two conditions, / The name 'manas', the distinction of the two absorptions, / Non-conception admitted to have defilement, / And the self of sentient beings would not be established." From here downward is the second part: the actual debate contains six proofs through reasoning; in this first proof, the text has two parts: first, citing the sūtra as proof; next, logical interrogation and explanation. As in the Pratītyasamutpāda-sūtra, there are four kinds of ignorance: first, active; second, seed; third, associated; fourth, unassociated. Or it is divided into two: shared and unshared, etc. Here, what is interrogated as unshared means that this [ignorance] is subtle and constantly operates, its ākāra is difficult to discern, it conceals the principle of non-self, and it obscures anāsrava wisdom—this is called obscuring true reality. True reality has two meanings: first, the principle of non-self; second, anāsrava vision. "Artha" (meaning/object) has two meanings: first, the objective referent, being the object of the darśanabhāga; second, the fundamental principle, because tathatā is precisely the principle. Furthermore, unshared ignorance is mutually relied upon and trusted in both Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna sūtras. The above is the sūtra text. "If this consciousness did not exist, that could not exist" is the treatise master's statement. What is called unshared?