成唯識論述記 5.585

5.585

述曰：論說與四煩惱俱故，不言與隨煩惱俱故。《對法》第七說，諸煩惱皆名為隨。前師可爾。若隨非根本，此是根本亦是隨攝，以隨不言是煩惱故，即此三種唯說是根本，純隨中無，故證此三非隨惑也。若爾，此癡何名不共？

The Commentary states: The treatises say that it is together with four afflictions; they do not say that it is together with secondary afflictions. The seventh fascicle of the Abhidharmasamuccaya says that all afflictions are called secondary. For the previous master, this might be admissible. If secondary [afflictions] are not roots, these are roots and are also subsumed under secondary [afflictions], because as secondary ones they are not called [root] afflictions. Thus these three are only stated to be roots and are not present among pure secondary ones; therefore, this proves that these three are not secondary afflictions. If so, why is this delusion called unshared?