成唯識論述記 5.589

5.589

述曰：下釋難也。此外人問，此俱見等非為主，故應名相應；若許為主，彼亦應名不共，以癡例餘為主應爾。

The Commentary states: Below resolves objections. Here an opponent asks: Since view and the others associated with this are not sovereign, they should be called associated; if they are conceded to be sovereign, they too should be called unshared, because by analogy with delusion, when the others are sovereign it should be so.