成唯識論述記 5.611

5.611

述曰：下釋別。此第二無明中有二：一、主獨行，迷諦理起，唯分別起，唯見道斷，不與忿等十種相應。若在欲界，與後五隨、無慚、無愧七隨俱轉；或八，或十二，或十，如前四說，諸隨煩惱遍染相應。此何以知？如契經說等，唯是分別。《緣起初勝法門經》第二卷說，即知彼文唯據此一無明為論，非謂一切。

The Commentary states: Below explains the distinctions. In this second ignorance there are two: 1. Sovereign and solitary-active, which arises from confusion about truth principles, arises purely from conceptual discrimination, is abandoned only by the vision path, and is not associated with the ten such as anger. If in the desire realm, it operates together with the latter five secondary [afflictions], shamelessness, and unconscionableness—seven secondary [afflictions]; or eight, or twelve, or ten, as in the previous four explanations, where various secondary afflictions are universally associated with defilement. How is this known? As stated in the sūtras, etc., it is purely conceptually discriminated. The second fascicle of the Pratītyasamutpādādiviśeṣavibhāṅga-śāstra states this, so one knows that that text proceeds solely on the basis of this one ignorance, and does not refer to all.