成唯識論述記 5.879

5.879

述曰：善中地者，如次前說遍三地也。此中輕安不遍欲界，若如初說，從多分或加行等說故。染四皆無，亦從多故，如無明、貪等，通三界地。八大隨惑非皆通地及俱，以非皆通地等故。總言非四，依種類而作論故。後四不定通三性故，唯有一也，此所無義，應審簡別。

The Commentary states: Regarding 'grounds' among the wholesome [dharmas], as explained immediately prior, they pervade the three grounds. Here, pliancy does not pervade the desire realm; if one takes it according to the initial explanation, it is stated on the basis of the majority, or in terms of preparatory practice and so forth. That none of the four [criteria] are present among the defiled is likewise based on the majority: just as ignorance, greed, and so forth pervade the grounds of the three realms, the eight greater secondary afflictions do not all pervade the grounds nor do they [all] occur together, because they do not all pervade the grounds, and so on. Stating generally that they do not possess the four [criteria] is because the treatise is composed relying on categories. Because the final four indeterminate [dharmas] pervade the three natures, they possess only one. The points where these are lacking should be carefully distinguished.