成唯識論述記 6.146

6.146

述曰：此第二解，或所觀境多定、惠俱。此愚昧者雖無惠數，從餘多分故說定境名為所觀，如欲界中戲忘念天，以多耽染故專注一境，意憤恚天角眼相視，專心致死。又或起貪，或瞋他等，唯有專注而無簡擇，亦癡多故，其類非一。如此愚癡闇昧多者，唯有定故，於所觀起一定也。

The Commentary states: This is the second explanation: or, objects of contemplation mostly have concentration and wisdom concurrent. Although this foolish person lacks the mental factor of wisdom, following the majority of others, the object of concentration is called 'an object of contemplation.' Just as in the desire realm, the gods who forget through play, because of excessive indulgence and attachment, focus intently on a single object; and the gods corrupted by anger glare at each other with sidelong glances, concentrating their minds to the point of death. Moreover, some give rise to greed, or anger toward others, and so forth, having only concentrated focus without discernment, also because of a predominance of delusion; their kinds are not one. For those with such great delusion and darkness, because there is only concentration, one concentration arises toward what is contemplated.