成唯識論述記 6.277

6.277

述曰：此論主釋。慚、愧俱以羞恥為相，即是此二自相既同，何理能遮我前所設難：一、體無別難；二、不相應難；三、應假有難；四、非遍善難。故我可然，有二別相，所緣不別故。

The Commentary states: This is the author's explanation. Shame and modesty both take bashfulness/humiliation as their character; that is, since the self-characters of these two are the same, by what principle could you refute the objections I raised previously? Namely: (1) the objection that their entities are undifferentiated; (2) the objection that they are not associated; (3) the objection that they would have to be nominal existents; (4) the objection that they would not pervade wholesome [minds]. Therefore, my position is tenable, for there are two distinct characters and the intentional object is not differentiated.