成唯識論述記 6.297

6.297

述曰：下引證。有二文證，此以教理齊難。何以知實？亦有文證。《瑜伽》五十七卷說：大悲以彼無嗔、無癡二法為體，非二十二根攝。若無癡以惠為性，此大悲如十力，應二十二根中惠根、三無漏等根所攝。彼說十力、四無畏等惠根等攝，不攝悲故，此為一違。然彼前師何以解此文？彼云：以有無嗔為體，故非根攝，至下當知。

The Commentary states: Below is the citation of evidence. There are two textual proofs; this uses both teaching and reasoning to pose an objection. How is it known to be real? There is also textual proof. Fascicle 57 of the *Yogācārabhūmi* states: "Great compassion takes those two dharmas of non-anger and non-delusion as its entity, and is not subsumed under the twenty-two faculties." If non-delusion took wisdom as its nature, this great compassion, like the ten powers, should be subsumed under the faculty of wisdom and the three undefiled faculties among the twenty-two faculties. That text states that the ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, and so forth are subsumed under the faculty of wisdom and the like, but does not subsume compassion; this is the first contradiction. But how does the former master explain this passage? He says: "Because it has non-anger as its entity, it is not subsumed under that faculty," as will be known below.