成唯識論述記 6.352

6.352

述曰：由前道理推不放逸防、修之用，離無貪等四法總、別之能，竟不可得，故不放逸定無別體。問：何故此中以無貪為首等餘三法，不以精進為初？答：次前別簡中，以無貪為首故，從近而結也。即顯不逸不如小乘體是實有，即是假有之所以也。

The Commentary states: By using the preceding reasoning to investigate the function of guarding and cultivating belonging to heedfulness, apart from the combined and distinct capacities of the four factors—non-greed and the like—it can never be found. Therefore, heedfulness definitely has no separate entity. Question: Why is non-greed placed at the head of the other three factors here, rather than starting with vigor? Answer: Because non-greed was placed at the head in the distinct differentiation immediately preceding, the conclusion follows from what was nearest. This demonstrates that, unlike [the view of] the Small Vehicle where its entity is substantially existent, it is nominally existent, which is the reason for this.