成唯識論述記 6.378

6.378

述曰：釋不應為善法所以。此欣、厭等雖義望前十一有別，然非實有。《雜事經》者，是《阿含經．雜事品》及今《法蘊足》並廣解，及《大論》五十六、六十九，皆具有染名字解之，翻彼善等。雖依義別說種種名，而體離此十一法更無異故，不別立之。

The Commentary states: This explains the reason why they should not be [established as separate] wholesome factors. Although these factors like rejoicing and revulsion differ in meaning from the preceding eleven, they are not substantially existent. The Kṣudrakavastu-sūtra is the Kṣudraka-vastu section of the Āgamas; it and the current Dharmaskandha both explain them extensively, and the fifty-sixth and sixty-ninth fascicles of the Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra both explain them completely using the names of defilements, as the opposites of those wholesome factors and so forth. Although various names are stated according to differences in meaning, because their entities are not different apart from these eleven factors, they are not separately established.