成唯識論述記 6.394

6.394

述曰：不疑三解，如文可知。《瑜伽》第八：疑謂分別異覺為體，覺即惠也。五十八云：簡擇猶豫，故正簡擇即是正見。不疑說為正見少分，亦有此理。然隨煩惱有八，相翻入善之中謂無慚、無愧、不信、懈怠、惛沈、掉舉、害、放逸，餘十二不翻。前解九法訖，以是小煩惱攝一段明之。下有三法，皆通染心起，故在後簡。

The Commentary states: The three explanations of non-doubt may be understood from the text. Yogācārabhūmi fascicle 8 says: "Doubt has as its essence discriminative divergent awareness; awareness is simply discernment (prajñā)." Fascicle 58 states: "Selecting and evaluating with hesitation; therefore, correct selection and evaluation is simply right view." Non-doubt being explained as a fraction of right view also has this rationale. However, eight secondary afflictions are directly inverted into wholesome states: namely, non-shame (ahrīkatā), non-embarrassment (anapatrāpya), non-faith (aśraddhā), indolence (kausīdya), torpor (styāna), restlessness (auddhatya), harm (vihiṃsā), and heedlessness (pramāda); the remaining twelve are not so inverted. The preceding explanation of the nine factors is concluded; they were explained in one section because they are subsumed under the minor afflictions. The three factors below all arise in common with defiled states of mind, and are therefore distinguished at the end.