成唯識論述記 6.450

6.450

述曰：此等皆通有尋、伺等三地，有何失也？初禪、中間、上地之定有輕安故，但諸心所無不皆然，然自於有尋、伺等有長短也。然返覆文理，不言欲界有定得有輕安故，後師為勝。此中餘義同故，更無異說。

The Commentary states: These are all pervasive of the three stages, such as that with vitarka and vicāra; what fault is there? Because the samādhi of the first dhyāna, the intermediate dhyāna, and higher stages possesses pliancy, all mental factors are like this without exception, though in their own presence in the stages with vitarka and vicāra and so forth there is greater or lesser scope. However, re-evaluating the text and logic, it is never stated that if the desire realm has samādhi it can have pliancy; therefore, the latter master is superior. Because the remaining points here are the same, there are no further divergent explanations.