成唯識論述記 6.508

6.508

述曰：五十五說六煩惱中，見是世俗有，又彼自釋言即慧分故；餘五實有，彼亦自釋別有性故，故知疑體非即是慧。若即慧者，應同五見說世俗有，應立量云：疑體非即慧；六煩惱中不說世俗有故；如貪等四。

The Commentary states: Fascicle fifty-five states that among the six afflictions, view is conventionally existent, and it further explains on its own that it is a part of prajñā; the other five are substantially existent, which it also explains on its own as having distinct natures. Therefore, one knows the nature of doubt is not identical with prajñā. If it were identical with prajñā, it should be said to be conventionally existent like the five views. One should establish the syllogism: The nature of doubt is not identical with prajñā; because it is not stated to be conventionally existent among the six afflictions; like the four beginning with greed.