成唯識論述記 6.564

6.564

述曰：下文有三：一、會前標舉；二、引事；三、類教。此初也。修道俱生亦有常見，《瑜伽》等依麁相說故。何謂麁相？謂得現觀者入無我觀，已知分別我已斷訖，出觀之時便生恐怖，今者我我何所在耶？即初我者，俱生我也；又言我者，分別我也。修道我、義言我、分別我何所在耶？依此初出觀時，緣涅槃起恐怖斷見，非修道中說無常見。此如何等？

The Commentary states: The following text has three parts: first, reconciling the earlier cited text; second, adducing mundane facts; third, assimilating other teachings. This is the first part. On the path of cultivation, the innate also includes the view of permanence, because Yogācāra and other works speak according to its coarse characteristics. What is meant by coarse characteristics? When one who has attained direct realization enters the contemplation of selflessness, having already known that the intellectually formed self has been eradicated, upon emerging from the contemplation they give rise to fear and dread: 'Where then is the self of me now?' The first 'self' is the innate self; the second 'self' mentioned is the intellectually formed self. Where are the self of the path of cultivation, the self of conventional designation, and the intellectually formed self? Based on this, when first emerging from contemplation, conditioned by nirvāṇa, they give rise to the terrifying view of annihilation; it is not said that there is no view of permanence in the path of cultivation. How is this illustrated?