成唯識論述記 6.592

6.592

述曰：瞋與三見或得俱起。且身、邊見，謂緣樂俱行蘊為我及常，見不生瞋，故以順於己。《對法》約前二取及此，故說瞋非見俱。若於苦處緣苦俱行蘊為我及常見，便生憎恚，云我何用此身，生憎恚故。《瑜伽》二文依此一分說得俱起，此通俱生、分別，如下無妨。

The Commentary states: Anger and the [other] three views can sometimes arise together. First, regarding the view of self-existence and extreme views: when taking aggregates accompanied by pleasure as the self and as permanent, the view does not generate anger, because they are agreeable to oneself. The Samuccaya states that anger is not associated with views with reference to the preceding two grasps and this [case]. But if in a painful state one takes aggregates accompanied by suffering as the self and as permanent, one gives rise to hatred and indignation, saying, 'What use do I have for this body?'—thus giving rise to hatred and indignation. The two passages in the Yogācāra state that they can arise together based on this one aspect; this applies to both the innate and the intellectually formed, which presents no obstruction below.