成唯識論述記 6.596

6.596

述曰：惡事、好事邪見撥者，如次說瞋或無或有，謂撥惡事無，便不與瞋俱，喜苦無故；撥樂蘊無，便與瞋俱，憎樂無故。《對法》依三見一分二取全，說不與瞋俱；《瑜伽》約三見少分，說瞋相應，見為一門明故。

The Commentary states: Repudiating bad matters and good matters by wrong view is stated, respectively, to have anger absent or present. That is, repudiating bad matters as non-existent does not occur together with anger, because of joy that suffering is non-existent; repudiating pleasurable aggregates as non-existent does occur together with anger, because of hating the non-existence of pleasure. The Samuccaya says it does not associate with anger based on one portion of the three views and all of the two grasps; the Yogācāra states that anger associates based on a small portion of the three views, explaining views under a single heading.