成唯識論述記 7.163

7.163

述曰：下文有二：初總，後別。此文總也。二法雖非無分別智，真無漏道相應，名無漏引；或加行時引無漏道故，從後得智之所引生，俱時引故，亦通非斷等。此解即通無漏師義。後解雖非正智，及後得俱真無漏道而能引彼，如憂；從彼引生，如苦，亦通非斷。後解即不通無漏師義。

The Commentary states: Below are two sections: first, general; second, specific. This is the general text. Although the two phenomena are not associated with non-conceptual wisdom, the true uncontaminated path, they are called induced by the uncontaminated; or during the preparatory stage, they induce the uncontaminated path, and being induced and produced from subsequent wisdom, being induced concurrently, they also extend to non-abandonment and so forth. This explanation is the position of the masters who hold that they extend to the uncontaminated. The second explanation is that although they are not the true uncontaminated path accompanied by fundamental wisdom and subsequent [wisdom], they can induce it, like sorrow; and being induced and produced from it, like pain, they also extend to non-abandonment. This latter explanation is the position of the masters who hold that they do not extend to the uncontaminated.