成唯識論述記 7.173
成唯識論述記 7.173
- Language
- Classical Chinese
7.173
述曰:下會違也。雖說尋、伺必是分別,而不定說於五法中,唯屬第三分別,以彼五法後得正智中亦有分別故。分別有二種:一、有漏心名分別,即五法中分別;二、緣事名分別,即後得智亦名分別。或立三分別:二種如前,第三更加遍計心名分別。然《大論》第五解此二,是三界心、心所法名分別。雖據有漏作論,不言「唯」故。今於此中第一師說:尋、伺體唯有漏,即無漏初靜慮支闕無尋、伺。若准第二師說:十地、二乘因中有無漏初靜慮五支,至佛便無,但即思、惠。然無麁細不可說為能治支地。此義應思。於禪支中極須分別,如《樞要》說。
The Commentary states: Below is the resolution of apparent contradictions. Although it is said that vitarka and vicāra must be conceptual discrimination, it is not determinately said that among the five dharmas, they belong solely to the third dharma, conceptual discrimination; because within the subsequent-attainment correct wisdom among those five dharmas, there is also conceptual discrimination. Conceptual discrimination is of two kinds: first, defiled mind is called conceptual discrimination, which is the conceptual discrimination among the five dharmas; second, cognition of conventional affairs is called conceptual discrimination, whereby subsequent-attainment wisdom is also called conceptual discrimination. Or, three conceptual discriminations are posited: two kinds as before, with a third added, where the mind of imagined construction is called conceptual discrimination. However, the fifth fascicle of the Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra explains these two as the minds and mental factors of the three realms, calling them conceptual discrimination. Although the treatise was composed on the basis of the defiled, it does not say 'only'. Now, herein, the first master states that the substance of vitarka and vicāra is exclusively defiled; thus, the undefiled factors of the first dhyāna lack vitarka and vicāra. If one follows the second master, the five factors of the undefiled first dhyāna exist in the causal stage of the ten grounds and the two vehicles, but do not exist upon reaching Buddhahood, being merely cetanā and prajñā. However, since they lack grossness and subtlety, they cannot be said to be the antidote factors of that stage. This point should be considered. Among the factors of dhyāna, detailed discrimination is utmostly necessary, as explained in the Shunyao.
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Linked texts (1)
- 成唯識論 — Classical Chinese