成唯識論述記 7.365

7.365

述曰：第二師云：不然，以《大論》第十三但說六時名無心故。謂前五位及二乘無餘依位。何以不爾？應說八位名無心，故應說死生二位，此五位中即悶絕中攝，以生死苦逼極悶絕故。若爾，頌何故說「及」、「與」二言？

The Commentary states: The second master says: That is not so, because the thirteenth fascicle of the Great Treatise only states six times that are called unconscious: namely, the previous five states and the state of the two vehicles without remainder. Why would it not be so? If it were, one should have spoken of eight states as unconscious; hence one should say the two states of death and birth are subsumed within swoon among these five states, because they are extreme swoons pressed by the suffering of birth and death. If so, why does the verse state the two words 'and' and 'together with'?